Knife Crimes: Stories, Statistics, and Sweden

lets talk about knives

As the #GunControlNow battle rages on online, between two camps that won’t listen or understand each other, and where both sides are throwing emotionally loaded words in each other’s virtual faces, I’d like to give a couple of cents on a different, but closely related issue: Knife crimes in Sweden.

At an Ikea-store in the middle of Sweden, August 10, 2015, a mom and her son gets stabbed to death – Sending a shock wave through not only the city of VästerĂĄs where the deed was done but also on comment sections on social media. The weapon of choice for the murderer? A knife from the store. The focus of the story was the nature of the murderer and the murder: Immigrant that got denied a stay and was to be transferred over to Italy, where he already got asylum.

Frustrated, he decided to pick victims at random and do the deed. As this was the part of the story that got the most attention, the knife crime itself was just added to the statistics, a number that’s constantly ticking up. The Swedish comedian BetnĂ©r accidentally made a meme that follows him even today, 4 years later, in his response video to the Ikea-murders: “Sweden has never been safer“. This phrase is constantly used ironically every time a crime is reported on in Swedish social media-circles, especially if the perpetrator is an immigrant.

The stories behind the statistics matters: If we can’t interpret the number and understand the patterns, it is very hard to put in solutions for real life, or change the patterns.

In the #GunControlNow debate that is happening over in the United States, one side emphasizes the headlines, the stories, while the other leans heavily on statistics. Both are needed to get the whole picture but nobody seems interested in this and are more interested in a screaming contest instead. In BetnĂ©r’s case its even weirder: He was trying to make up his own story, parallel to the ongoing one, and based it on a feeling that he was right and believed he said the right things for his specific target audience: A swing and a miss, later and Swedish Redditors got themselves a new dank meme.

England, or more specifically London, has always been seen as the eye of the knife-crime storm of Europe. Infamous for its machete-wielding population and pickpockets that slice handbags off women’s shoulders, I had a picture of the United Kingdoms as the land of the bladed weapon in modern Europe. Turns out I was wrong. [1]

England and Wales’s population are 5.8 times bigger than Sweden, but only had 2.5 times more knife crimes reported than Sweden back in 2015 – It is very hard to do a cross-country comparison like this and its never going to be exact in any way since laws and policing are different, but its quite curious that there is such a big difference between population size and knife crimes. It doesn’t paint the whole picture, but it tells us something.

While the Swedish government suggests raising the punishment for carrying a knife on your person (carrying a knife is forbidden in all public spaces, including in your car) as a solution to the increasing knife-crimes, because they only look on the dramatic numbers and have no clue about the story (an ironic contrast to the American gun-debate in mainstream media).

Innocent victims to crime don’t even have the option of having defensive weaponry on their person in Sweden, that’s a privilege for police officers only. A perpetrator getting a few months more in jail or being fined a few hundred Kronor more for having a blade in their pocket is helping victims how?


[1] Statistics from BRÅ (For Sweden, English text) and BBC News (For UK and Wales)


Thank you for coming by and reading! Would you like to support the Utopium-project? We accept cryptocurrencies via Bitbacker – Thank you for your consideration! 

3 comments

  1. Well done! What do you suggest as a solution?
    In the US, one side demands an end to private ownership of guns, while the polar opposite wants nearly everyone to be armed. This hasn’t worked in the past and won’t work in the future, so we’ll probably just slowly erode the personal liberties that we have come to expect, unless an actual shooting civil war breaks out. I see parallels between our situation now and Tsarist Russia before the Reds (Communists) came to power.

    Liked by 1 person

    • In Swedens case it is very tricky, since the different parts of Sweden isn’t independent and everyone must obey the central government, so different parts of the country can’t try and figure out different solutions for their specific problems without dragging the rest of the country with them towards their sollution, good or bad.

      In the united states its a touch better, since States have more than zero self-governance from the federal government and can test different ways to approach the problem.

      Both countries have some things in common in sofar that a total ban on civilian-owned weapons would have virtually zero impact, while in other parts would revolt.

      I’m leaning towards the golden middle way that is state, city and county can figure out whats best for themselves and hope that people vote with their feet overtime. Not perfect, mind, but at least not worse than slowly nibbling away at freedoms like now (Red flag laws in the US case and making it harder to have and keep gun licenses in the Swedish case).

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s